One of the prime tasks of a consultant quantity surveyor is to perform tender evaluations in view of preparing tender reports. While I was working as a consultant quantity surveyor, I had ample chances of performing this task. This is where I stumbled on the term "Abnormally Low Tenders (ALT)" for the first time.
In the beginning of my career, I used to benchmark the rates submitted by the respective tenderers against the pretender estimate performed by my own organisation for the respective tender. Whenever a rate submitted by a tenderer deviates by +or - 15% of that of the pretender estimate, we used to query the respective tenderer as a good practice.
In one of those tenders, I observed a significant deviation of the Glassfibre Reinforced Concrete (GRC) screens priced. They were about 40% less than that of the pretender estimate. Firstly, I was quite alarmed, as I had a doubt whether the rate in the pretender estimate was correct. Then I had a sigh of relief as the rate is less, not more which will never contribute to exceed the pretender estimate. This is a common mistake as most quantity surveyors think that if the pretender estimate has not been exceeded, the client will be happy, but in reality if you provide an overestimated pretender estimate, the client will block more money than required for the project wherein the client lose the opportunity to invest those additional money somewhere else. However, in this case, the other tenderers have priced GRC screen rates closer to that of the pretender. Therefore I regained confidence of our pretender estimate.
Then the question came into my mind, how on earth this particular tenderer has priced the GRC screens substantially lower than that of the others. The query answer by the tenderers threw some light into the matter. They have got their own GRC fabrication yard. As most of the GRC screens are very common across construction projects (especially in the Middle East, the patterns are similar) they have got the moulds of the exact GRC screens in place. Therefore there is no requirement for this particular tenderer to include the price of the GRC moulds into their unit rate.
This is what we call as "Economics of Manufacturing Process" where certain tenderers will get an advantage over the others which is justifiable. There are other similar cases I found within tenders which promotes this notion especially if a tenderer owns his/her own prefabrication yards of various Construction elements such as Post Tension (PT) slabs, Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) blocks, etc.
I hope to write more case studies on this subject which you will be able to read in near future.
In the beginning of my career, I used to benchmark the rates submitted by the respective tenderers against the pretender estimate performed by my own organisation for the respective tender. Whenever a rate submitted by a tenderer deviates by +or - 15% of that of the pretender estimate, we used to query the respective tenderer as a good practice.
In one of those tenders, I observed a significant deviation of the Glassfibre Reinforced Concrete (GRC) screens priced. They were about 40% less than that of the pretender estimate. Firstly, I was quite alarmed, as I had a doubt whether the rate in the pretender estimate was correct. Then I had a sigh of relief as the rate is less, not more which will never contribute to exceed the pretender estimate. This is a common mistake as most quantity surveyors think that if the pretender estimate has not been exceeded, the client will be happy, but in reality if you provide an overestimated pretender estimate, the client will block more money than required for the project wherein the client lose the opportunity to invest those additional money somewhere else. However, in this case, the other tenderers have priced GRC screen rates closer to that of the pretender. Therefore I regained confidence of our pretender estimate.
Then the question came into my mind, how on earth this particular tenderer has priced the GRC screens substantially lower than that of the others. The query answer by the tenderers threw some light into the matter. They have got their own GRC fabrication yard. As most of the GRC screens are very common across construction projects (especially in the Middle East, the patterns are similar) they have got the moulds of the exact GRC screens in place. Therefore there is no requirement for this particular tenderer to include the price of the GRC moulds into their unit rate.
This is what we call as "Economics of Manufacturing Process" where certain tenderers will get an advantage over the others which is justifiable. There are other similar cases I found within tenders which promotes this notion especially if a tenderer owns his/her own prefabrication yards of various Construction elements such as Post Tension (PT) slabs, Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) blocks, etc.
I hope to write more case studies on this subject which you will be able to read in near future.
Priyanka
ReplyDeleteReally admire ur attitude towards sharing knowledge ur learned and experience gained. Which I consider very rate among Engineers.
In SL during evaluation we benchmark the Engineering estimate and all comparison against it. As ur correctly pointed out there may bidders having advantages over rest and quote for unrealistic rate compared with Engineers rate.If we are not much sure about his performance then will ask additional performance security allowed in the contract. Is it require to ask the bidder to substantiate quoted rate with analysis or are we asking for problems .
Many thanks for your comments Sir. As per the The Public Contracts Regulations 2015 adopted by European Union (UK is still following the same) Article 69 (1), the contracting authorities shall seek explanation from the respectove tenderers under 6 categories. {;ease refer the link below for further details:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/102/regulation/69/made
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/102/regulation/69/made
ReplyDeleteThanks .Noted .
ReplyDeleteGood
ReplyDeleteThanks
DeleteVery good many thanks, look forward for more article like to follow those.
ReplyDeleteThanks. Sure
Delete